If you were asked to give the 30 second elevator speech
about what benefits procurement brings to an organization, what would you say?
I have asked this question of many individuals who are
professionals in Procurement and Supply Chain and inevitably, even with advance
warning, there is an inescapable reliance on terminology such as cost savings,
vendor evaluation, and negotiation. Some talk about strategic value-add, but
when pressed to define the meaning, one is often left with the feeling that it
is more about utilizing the buzz words without a clear understanding of their
significance.
So if Procurement cannot clearly articulate its value
proposition, we shouldn’t be surprised when our internal and external stakeholders
have branded procurement as the “necessary evil”.
Some might dispute this characterization and there is no
question that in some organizations Procurement is higher up the value chain
than in others. However, even the most successful Procurement groups will
reluctantly admit that it requires a constant concentrated effort to maintain a
respected position within all aspects of the business.
So how does Procurement evolve itself from the Rodney
Dangerfield’s of the organization “I don’t get
no respect”, to an integral value added partner to the enterprise?
no respect”, to an integral value added partner to the enterprise?
Procurement as a profession needs to decide what it’s brand
image is. According to Wikipedia, marketers engaged in branding seek to develop
or align expectations behind the brands experience, creating the impression
that a product or service has certain qualities that make it special or unique.
Other professions have developed effective brands. Legal is
about risk mitigation; Accounting relates to the numbers; Human Resources is
about the organization’s human capital; Sales provides revenue generation; and
of course Marketing creates brand awareness amongst other things. No one in an
organization would ever imply that they have the expertise that the
professionals have in these disciplines. Yet most believe that they can achieve
better results than Procurement in acquiring goods and services for the firm.
A significant reason for this is that Procurement
continually carries the “hair-shirt” of cost savings, which when translated by
the business means price at any cost. Moreover as the individuals within
Procurement are heavily metriced on this particular indicator, the behavior
that it engenders is counter to value for money.
If it can’t be measured in direct bottom-line dollars, there
seems to be no marching band heralding to the senior leadership the benefit of
procurement to the enterprise. When Procurement often tries to expand the
discussion beyond savings, inevitably it faces the Jack Webb (Dragnet) of the
organization “Just the savings ma’am, just the savings”.
So how do we as Procurement professionals get off the
hamster wheel of savings to change our Brand to all stakeholders?
Procurement needs to strategically position itself as the
only aspect of the corporation that truly has a 360o lens on the
entire business. It has a full scope view into the directions of the enterprise
from having touch points with all of the internal stakeholders. In addition,
with its on-going dealings with the external stakeholders – vendors – it has
additional insight into the marketplace – trends, opportunities and pitfalls.
Vendors are often clients and/or competitors which further enhances the focus
on the business lens.


As the purveyors of the business standing high atop the
mountain, able to see the sky, the land and the sea, procurement can provide a
vision for the business which is unavailable to most and could enhance the
success of the business.
Just don’t go too close to the cliff’s edge and look down.
You might just be enchanted by the siren’s song of cost savings thinking it
will prove your value, but which inevitably just brands procurement as a
one-trick pony!
(note: I wrote this article and it was published in Supply & Demand Chain Executive magazine several years ago. It is still as relevant now as it was a few years ago)
(note: I wrote this article and it was published in Supply & Demand Chain Executive magazine several years ago. It is still as relevant now as it was a few years ago)
No comments:
Post a Comment